Summons
WHAT IS SUMMONS?
Summons is a formal legal document which is issued by a court directing an Individual to appear before the court at a specified date, time, and place. It serves as an official notice indicating the continuation or a commencement of legal proceedings which requires the appearance of either a defendant, an accused or a witness or any other person whose appearance is important for adjudication. basically, it is a least invasive process of the court used to compel attendance.[1]
Importence of summons
Summons uphold the principle of natural justice which is that no person can ordinarily be bound by a judicial decision without first being given notice and a fair opportunity to be heard which rests on the rule against bias and right to a fair hearing audi alteram partem, (hear the other side). Courts serve summons because A plaintiff filing a lawsuit must notify the defendant that a case has been filed so they can appear and defend themselves and this applies to accused persons and witnesses as well.[2] Summons reflect a proportionate approach but if it is not complied courts escalate to warrants only if a person fails to comply without justification.
OFFICIAL DEFINITION OF SUMMONS
There is no single universal statutory definition of summons under Indian law. Instead, this concept is understood through procedural legislation and other authoritative legal sources which collectively establishes summons as a formal judicial process by prescribing the manner of its issuance, service, and its legal consequences.
'Summons' as defined in legislation(s)
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
The Code of Civil Procedure does not contain a separate definition clause for summons but Order V contains "Issue of Summons" and its functions as an operative definition: it prescribes that a summons must be in writing, signed by the judge or an authorised officer, and must bear the seal of the court as it serves as a direction to the defendant, witnness or an importent individual to appear and answer the claim, it also specifies the date, time, and place of appearance, and generally be accompanied by a copy of the plaint.[3] Section 27 requires this service to be done within thirty days of institution of the suit this is an outer limit on the plaintiff's diligence and it is not a mandate that service be completed within thirty days as it is clarified by the Supreme Court in Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India; Section 28 governs this service where the defendant resides in another State; Section 29 covers service of foreign summonses; and Section 143 which is a state amendment addresses postage. Following the Amendment Acts of 1999 and 2002, Order V Rule 9 was amended to permit delivery by registered post, speed post, approved courier, fax, or email; Order V Rule 9-A allows the plaintiff to personally tender the summons; and Order V Rule 9(4) permits service outside the court's jurisdiction through a locally approved courier.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)
This came as an replacement to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with effect from 1 July 2024 summons secures the appearance of the accused, witnesses, or other parties, and Chapter VI of the CrPC which is now replaced by the corresponding chapter of the BNSS which came in force from 1 July 2024 providing three modes of compelling attendance: summons, warrant, and proclamation.[4] Section 61 CrPC which is Section 63 BNSS requires every summons to be in writing, in duplicate, signed and sealed by the court, or in electronic form bearing the seal's image, with willful disobedience punishable under Section 174 IPC and amounting to contempt. Section 204 CrPC now Section 207 BNSS empowers a magistrate to issue a summons or warrant on taking cognizance in the form prescribed under Form 1 of the Second Schedule. Service is governed by Section 62 CrPC now Section 64 BNSS, requiring personal service where practicable with electronic service permitted under the Section 64(2) BNSS proviso; affixation, under Section 65 CrPC now Section 67 BNSS; and witness service by post, under Section 69 CrPC now Section 71 BNSS, with Section 71(1) BNSS also allowing simultaneous electronic and postal service. Further safeguards which include Section 87 CrPC which is warrant despite a summons case on recorded reasons, Section 202 CrPC which is inquiry before summoning an accused outside jurisdiction, to prevent harassment, and Section 105 CrPC which is reciprocal foreign service arrangements via Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines).
Indian Court-fees Act, 1870
Section 20 of the Court-fees Act, 1870 which is titled "Rules as to costs of processes" as it empowers the High Courts to frame rules regulating the costs of court process which as a matter of legal categorization, includes summons. Specifically, the section requires rules on: (i) the fees that is chargeable for serving and executing processes issued by the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction and by the Civil and Revenue Courts within its local limits; (ii) the fees chargeable for serving and executing processes issued by Criminal Courts within such limits in respect of offences other than those for which police officers may arrest without a warrant; and (iii) the remuneration of peons and other persons employed, with the leave of a court, in the service or execution of processes. The High Court retains the power to alter and add to these rules from time to time.
Legal provision(s) relating to 'Summons'
These provisions do not clearly define summons, but these are conceptually necessary to understand it fully essentially for clarifying who summons may be served on and how it differs from supplementary process.
- Order III Rule 3, 5 and 6 CPC which extend the reach of summons to recognized agents and pleaders and by providing clarification that service need not always be personal to the party itself
- Order XXVII Rule 4, Order XXVIII Rule 3, Order XXIX Rule 2, and Order XXX Rule 3 CPC this extend the service to the government, authorized persons, corporations, and partners respectively by showing that "summons" operates differently depending on the legal personality of the recipient.
- Section 41A CrPC the corresponding BNSS provision on notice of appearance is conceptually related but is distinct to a police notice which directs appearance for questioning is not a "summons," since it does not originate from a court and does not, by itself, carry the same coercive consequence of contempt
- Warrant (BNSS Chapter VI, Part B) and Proclamation for a person absconding (BNSS Chapter VI, Part D) these are the two escalatory processes consequently adjacent to summons by which a magistrate may covert a summon into a warrant under the corresponding provision to the old section 87 CrPC where there is reason to believe the summons will be disobeyed which illustrates that summons is understood, relationally, as the least coercive of the three.
- Section 70(3) and Section 530 BNSS though these are framed as proof of service and electronic proceedings provisions rather than definition, these are conceptually essential because they create what counts as a legally valid service of summons in the digital era.
'Summons' as defined in international instrument(s)
Hague Convention on the service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1965[5]
This treaty under the Hague Conference on private international law governs the international service of a writ of summons in civil or commercial matters. India entered in this convention on 23rd November 2006 and came in force on 1st August 2007 and the same was notified via Gazette Notification G.S.R. 24(E) dated 12 January 2009 by the ministry of law and justice. and it is also specified under section 29(c) CPC that once a foreign summons is served through India's designated central authority in the compliance with that convention the same is treated as if it were a summons issued by an Indian court. there is an article 10 of this convention which says that the summon can be given directly through postal in India form the convention countries though this article has been opposed as convention countries must go through the central authority channel.[6]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966[7]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights does not use the word summons but their article 14(3)(a) which guarantees that anyone charged with a criminal offence has the right to be informed properly in time and in detail about the nature and cause of charge implied against him which is even backed by UN Human Right Committee who has confirmed for ensuring compliance even in legal proceedings where the accused is tried without physically presenting in the court. India ratified the ICCPR in the year 1979 by making article 14 relevant as an international due process benchmark against which domestic summons procedures which include sufficiency and timeline of notice can be measured even though it does not define summons as a term of the article.[8]
'Summons' as defined in official document(s)
- Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1507 (Ministry of law and justice, department of justice, answered 28 July 2023)[9] the national service and tracking of electronic processes (NSTEP) which is described as a technology enabled process serving and issuing of summons and claims have been made that it has been launched in 28 states and union territories which reflects the government's own operational characterization of what a summon is and how it is administratively processed[10]
- Delhi BNSS (service of summons and warrants) Rules, 2025 this was notified by the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi on 13 August 2025 which became effective from 14 august 2025 which repealed the earlier provision of Delhi BNSS (Service of Summons) Rules, 2025. this is a subordinate legislation official document that operationalizes electro summons which requires court to generate and issue process electronically through the case information system which mandates that electronic process bear the image of the courts seal and eSign of the presiding officer, it also requires every police station to establish an electronic summons delivery center.[11]
Summons' as defined in official government report(s)
41st Report of Law commission of India (the code of criminal procedure, 1898) 1969 [12]
In its chapter 16th (Complaints to magistrate) it was observed by the commission that many complaints were ill founded, and it was recommended that complaints are not facially convincing be subjected to supplementary scrutiny before a court summons the accused, this reasoning directly shaped what became section 202 CrPC stating the requirement to inquire before summoning an accused who resides outside the magistrate jurisdiction. this report shows an early policy concern that the summoning power be exercised cautiously as if not used properly it can hurdle personal liberty.[13]
154th Report of Law commission of India (the code of criminal procedure, 1973) 1996 [14]
This report made a comprehensive review of the CrPC and its recomendations perticularly those that are related to provision concerning arrest , custody and remand, procedure for summon and warrant cases, compounding of offences these were cited in the statement off objection and reasons for the CrPC amendment act, 2008/2009 as the basis for the legislative reformss of summons procedure.[14]
'Summons' as defined in case law(s)
Comparative dictum In State ex rel. DeGraffenreid v. Keet, 619 S.W.2d 873 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981) the missouri court of appeals held that a summons is more or less a notice or an invitation to a defenddent to come to court at a certain time to answer to a certain charge so that he may not be subjected to the inconvenience and embarrasment of an arrest this case stated that the classical judicial articulation of summons as the less coercive alternative to the arrest.[15]
Indian Judicial evolution
- Supreme Court of india in 2024 closed a writ petition which callenged the CrPC provision permitting summons to be accepted by a male family member on this ground the enactment of the BNSS had already removed the discriminatory requirement which reflected that the concept of valid service must evolve with constitutional equality norms[16]
- Bombay High Court in 2026 in the case of State of Maharashtra v. Satish (2026 SCC OnLine Bom 1419) held that the service of summons through mobile phone or watsapp is legally valid under section 70 and 530 BNSS and the reason that the court gave that once a legally recognised mmethod conveys notice to a person concerned this most recent judicial marker shows how the valid service of summons have been expanded to the electronic era.[17]
VARIATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK OF THE TERM SUMMONS
Concept
A summons is a court issued instrument which has a function of giving formal notice of proceedings and an opportunity to appear or respond which is different from a subpoena which basically compels testimony and evidences or a writ of execution which directly enforces judgement since a summons commands a defendant to a lawsuit within a specified period on the other hand subpoena compels a person to testify or documents under penalty of contempt.[18]
United states Practice of the term summons
In the US courts summons are used as an instruments which provides notice of civil proceedings and the opportunity to appear and be heard. In practice it is issued by the court served often by sheriff or process server and this summon must state the parties, case number, court, and response deadline with the procedural requirements.[15] Beyond federal rule 4 of the individual states are tightening regulation of process serving itself and for instance new york now requires process servers that are to be licensed, they use electronic logging systems and complete service within a 120 days window in most cases this reflects a shift from purely defining summons towards regulating the reliability and accountablity of the service procedure.[19]
United kingdom Practice of the term summons
UK moved away from the traditional instrument entirely as writ of summons was replaced in 1999 by the claim form uunder civil procedure rules as part of a broader simplification of the legal lingo. minor offences like littering are resolved by on spot fixed panelty notices with a court summons issued only if the notice is disputed graded offence severity linked approach to triggering formal procedure.[20]
Divergence from Indian Practice
India keeps the term summons as a procedural stage wheras UK has terminologically and procedurally combined it into claim form which reflects plain language, the summons stage alone has been found to consume roughly a quarter of a civil suits lifecycle with an average of 273 days on the service and a delay burden not imilarly documented as systematic in US and UK data collection [21] common law have coddified alternative and electronic modes like email, text, social media as formal court sanctioned fallback option with defined evidentiary safeguard whereas indias use remain judicially permitted but administratively ad hoc.[22]
TECHNOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION AND INITIATIVES
India's eCourts project introduced the auto generation of summons and dilivery va NSTEP ( this is a mobile app used for process servers alongside emerging but it is underused emails and whatsapp service which are drawn from Civil Procedure Code and the Information Technology Act, 2000 with scholars benchmarking best practices from the UK, US and Singapore [23]by contrast some of the us courts have gone as fa as sanctioning blockchain or NFT based service for anonymous cryptocurrency fraud defendents along with more conventional e filings and e summons system such as Massachusetts Housing Court's eSummons portal.[24]
APPEARANCE OF 'SUMMONS' IN DATABASE
How the concept invoked in the official databases and tracking systems
summons does not exist as an isolated data point anywhere in the judicial data architecture, it was invoked as a sub record which is burrowed inside the case records which was first generated inside case information system (CIS) then the same thing was embodied into NSTEP (National Service and Tracking of Electronic Processes) as a trackable process process object and then finally surfaced in aggregate form which are not individual summons but a case stage pendency statistics present in the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG), this NJDG holds case level pendency of data where summon stage one filter of case status it is not a discreate database of the summons.[25]
Apex departments and their data collection methods
- eCommittee, Supreme Court of India
- National Informatics Center (NIC), Ministry of Electronics & IT
- Department of Justice, Ministry of Law & Justice
their methodology is that the data is not independently collected by these bodies as it is entered once the case is at filing and processing stage by the court registry staff into the case information system which functions as a single original official source, NSTEP and NJDG both come from the same CIS record rather than being separetely populated. NJDG has been developed by national informatics center in the close coordination with in house software development team of the computer cell and registry with an interactive interface and analytics dashboard.
Database A (Governmental Database)
E-Committee Supreme Court of India website[26]
National Service and Tracking of Electronic Processes (NSTEP) is a new web application which was established by the e committee of the supreme court of India and the main purpose of this is to track the process services and notices and summons in real time. NSTEP web application enables allocation of published processes to the bailiffs, if the service is to be affected within their jurisdiction. it also facilitates allocation of published processes to respective court establishment inter district or inter state.
NSTEP Thus accomplishes the following significant goals
- Enabling the service of giving summons in electronic form
- Recordal and posting of the real time updates from the remote location reducing inordinate delays in the process services.
- time required by serving inter district and inter state process by post is exponentially reduced by serving it in the electronic form
- transparent tracking of service of process and summons by all the stakeholders
- GPS connectivity with Bhuvan maps which is India's geo-platform developed by ISRO

Database B (Non-Governmental Database)[27]
Indian Process Servers (Greves Group)[28]
Indian Process Servers (IPS) is a private non-government process serving division of the greves protection management pvt ltd that the tracks and executes the service of summons, notices, subpoenas, and other legal papers across India on behalf of law firms, litigants, and international clients which performs the same core function as NSTEP but for cases where the court does not electronically track delivery or where the client needs a faster private sector service.
Indian Process Servers thus accomplishes following goals
- enables serving of summons and legal document across all major cities and states of India including remote locations
- provides proof of delivery through notarized affedivte of service on the completion of the service our process service gives an affedevit of service as proof of service and the same is notarized before being dispatched to the applicant or a law firm
- they extend coverage to international and cross boarder summons service under the hague serivce convention which the NSTEP dosent handle since serving of the document can only be done by Central Authority, Department of Legal Affairs and in person for India
- they tracks the document through direct follow ups like we can help expediate the process, as we can do that by tracking the documents and contacting the relevant authorities to move further in the process
- maintains own internal client facing database which helps us to have an even wider databaseso as to get relevant documents more quickly and efficiently[29]

RESEARCH THAT ENGAGES WITH 'SUMMONS'
Summons in the digital age: Integrating Informaion and Communication Technology in the Process of serving summons [23]
It is the direct academic and cso engagement with the concept. it goes beyond official documentation by measuring the delay the governments own systems don't report in these terms as per a study conducted by the Vidhi on the bang lore rural courts, the summons stage accounts for the 1/4th of the life cycle of the civil suit. on an average 273 days are spent by the court in the process of serving summons thereby making summons a major cause of the delay across courts. this research also evaluates NSTEP itself noting a limitation that the governments own materials don't state, it serves as useful tool to monitor the service of summons and address the issue of accountability of the process servers. however, such process undo the other problems that are entrenched and contingent on human behavior like change of addresses and willful disobedience on part of party as accepting summons.
Service of summons: Legal and practical challenges in the state of Karnataka[30]
this research document builds the concept from a field level angle rather than a systems angle describing NSTEPS actual field data capture the bailiff utilizes the application to document the delivery of summons. the application includes a feature to record the GPS coordinates at time of delivery of summons and enables recording pictures and on-screen signature of the person who has been served. it focuses on state specific practical enforcement gaps rather than a national ICT policy prescription.
RELATED TERMS
- Legal Notification: Refers to the formal notification of legal documents to parties involved in a legal proceeding.
- Court Summons: Denotes the official document issued by the court to notify an individual or entity of legal actions being taken against them.
- Legal Notice: Represents the formal communication of legal intentions or actions, often served to parties involved in a legal matter.
- Judicial Notice: Indicates the formal acknowledgment or notification by the court regarding legal proceedings.
- Service of Summons: Describes the act of delivering court summons or legal notices to the concerned parties.
- Legal Process Notification: Signifies the communication of legal documents or notifications as part of the legal process.
REFERENCES
- ↑ Hemant More, ‘Service of Summons (Ss. 63 to 71 of BNSS)’ The Legal Quotient (18 June 2024) https://thelegalquotient.com/criminal-laws/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita/service-of-summons-ss-63-to-71-of-bnss/4019/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ WritingLaw, ‘Summons Under CPC’ WritingLaw https://www.writinglaw.com/summons-under-cpc/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ ILMS Academy, ‘Order 5 CPC: Issue and Service of Summons Explained (Rules, Procedure & Case Laws)’ (31 March 2026) https://www.ilms.academy/blog/issue-and-service-of-summons-order-v-cpc-1908 accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Hemant More, ‘Service of Summons (Ss. 63 to 71 of BNSS)’ The Legal Quotient (18 June 2024) https://thelegalquotient.com/criminal-laws/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita/service-of-summons-ss-63-to-71-of-bnss/4019/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, ‘Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial or Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters’ https://www.legalaffairs.gov.in/hague-conference/gsr24e-hague-convention-service-abroad-judicial-or-extra-judicial-documents-civil accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Nikhil Varshney and Ishu Gupta, ‘Serving Justice, Delayed in Transit: India and the Hague Service Convention’ SCC Times (20 September 2025) https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/09/20/india-hague-service-convention-challenges/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ United Nations Treaty Collection, ‘Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters’ https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’ https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, Report of the Expert Group on AI Governance (2023) https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s35d6646aad9bcc0be55b2c82f69750387/uploads/2023/09/20230922136540254.pdf accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Government of India, [Title of PDF] (2023) https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3ec03980a875ff6ef9c2d75e74307cbf5/uploads/2023/05/2023051872-1.pdf accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Kriti, ‘Delhi BNSS (Service of Summons and Warrants) Rules, 2025 Repeal Earlier Service of Summons Rules’ SCC Times (21 August 2025) https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/08/21/delhi-bnss-service-of-summons-and-warrants-rules-2025-notified-legal-news/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Parliament of India, [Title of Document] https://elibrary.sansad.in/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3d17b72-4ddd-4491-af6f-d87d8301f024/view accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Manupatra, [Title of PDF] https://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/801EACAE-B3E0-4F2D-A768-B2FF3B65E3C4.pdf accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Law Commission of India, One Hundred and Fifty-Fourth Report on the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (1996) https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3ca0daec69b5adc880fb464895726dbdf/uploads/2022/08/2022080878-1.pdf accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, ‘Summons’ Wex https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/summons accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Anmol Kaur Bawa, ‘“BNSS Removed Discriminatory Provision”: Supreme Court Closes Challenge to CrPC Section Which Says Only Male Family Members Can Accept Summons’ LiveLaw (9 July 2024) https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/bnss-removed-discriminatory-provision-supreme-court-closes-challenge-to-crpc-section-which-says-only-male-family-members-can-accept-summons-262758 accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Anjali C S, ‘Electronic Service of Summons Legally Valid under BNSS: Bombay High Court’ SCC Times (24 February 2026) https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2026/02/24/electronic-service-of-summons-legally-valid-under-bnss-bom-hc/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Legal Writing Experts, ‘Summons’ https://legalwritingexperts.com/civil-litigation/summons accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, ‘Rule 4. Summons’ Federal Rules of Civil Procedure https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_4 accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Wikipedia contributors, ‘Summons’ Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summons accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Vaidehi Misra, Aditya Ranjan and Deepika Kinhal, Summons in the Digital Age: Integrating Information and Communication Technology in the Process of Serving Summons (Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, November 2020) https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/201102_Summons-in-the-Digital-Age.pdf accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Illinois Supreme Court, ‘Illinois Supreme Court Reinforces Service of Summons Allowable via Social Media, Text and Email’ (25 April 2023) https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/News/1225/Illinois-Supreme-Court-reinforces-service-of-summons-allowable-via-social-media-text-and-email/news-detail/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Vaidehi Misra, Aditya Ranjan and Deepika Kinhal, Summons in the Digital Age: Integrating Information and Communication Technology in the Process of Serving Summons (Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, November 2020) https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/201102_Summons-in-the-Digital-Age.pdf accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ David Zaslowsky and John F Lawlor, ‘Bankruptcy Court Permits Service of Process by Airdropping NFTs to Cryptocurrency Wallet Addresses’ Blockchain (Baker McKenzie, 11 November 2024) https://blockchain.bakermckenzie.com/2024/11/11/bankruptcy-court-permits-service-of-process-by-airdropping-nfts-to-cryptocurrency-wallet-addresses/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Express News Service, ‘What Is the National Judicial Data Grid and How It Could Help Courts’ The Indian Express (15 September 2023) https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/everyday-explainers/national-judicial-data-grid-explained-8940972/ accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ e-Committee, Supreme Court of India, ‘NSTEP (National Service and Tracking of Electronic Processes)’ https://ecommitteesci.gov.in/nstep/ accessed 19 July 2026
- ↑ Indian Process Servers, ‘Process Service in India Under Hague Convention’ https://www.indianprocessservers.com/hague-convention.html accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Indian Process Servers, ‘Area Served’ https://www.indianprocessservers.com/area-served.htm accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ India Process Server, ‘Serving Summons & Writs in India’ https://www.indiaprocessserver.in/serving-summons-writs-india.html accessed 19 July 2026.
- ↑ Rhenius Caleb J and Sugapriya S, ‘Service of Summons: Legal and Practical Challenges in State of Karnataka’ (2025) 11(9) International Journal of Law 53 https://www.lawjournals.org/assets/archives/2025/vol11issue9/11199.pdf accessed 19 July 2026.
